Exclusion and exemption criteria for different exposure situations

ICRP in its Publication No. 104 (2007) provide guidance to national regulatory authorities on the scope of radiological protection using the principles of justification and optimization. Advice is provided for deciding the radiation exposure situations that need to be covered by the relevant regulations because their regulatory control can be justified. There are some situations where regulatory control is unjustified and need to be excluded because the exposures are unamenable to control. In some regulated practices, the regulatory control is unwarranted, and exemption from the regulations is found to be the optimum option,

The ICRP documents describe the exclusion and exemption criteria for planned exposure situations and the application of the criteria in emergency and existing exposure situations with some specific examples. The quantitative criteria need to be treated as generic values to the consideration by the national regulatory authorities for defining the scope of the control measures.

New Reference book on: Radiological Protection and Safety – A Practitioner’s Guide

Radiological protection and safety is the prime concern in all the radiation-related applications, i.e., nuclear power, nuclear fuel cycle operations, use in medicine for medical diagnosis and therapy and use in industry and research. The reference book: Radiological Protection and Safety – A Practitioner’s Guide is written by a well-experienced practitioner, Dr. Pushparaja, to introduce readers to all the relevant aspects of radiation, the effects, the applications, protection standards, transport of sources, control of occupational exposures, regulations and about the practice of radiological protection and safety.

There are specially trained and well-experienced team of professionals with this special knowledge of radiation protection and the safety who work tirelessly for protecting people who handle radiation and radioisotopes. There is also a need for protection of the environment. These experts practice radiation protection as a profession.

The methodology employed to ensure, the techniques and radiological protection of the occupational workers, the members of the public and the environment while utilizing the radiation sources in beneficial applications are presented in this reference book. Application details, exposures and exposure control measures, security, and transport of sources, management of radioactive waste and rules and regulations to be followed are discussed.

People, in general, are not aware of what and how these highly trained professionals do, to ensure protection. It is important that the reference book create awareness amongst educated and not so well educated about peaceful uses of atomic energy and radiological protection and safety.

The knowledge is a highly dispersed form, some organizations recommend protection standards, some provide guidance documents, some publish operating experience of the radiation sources in specific fields. National/international conferences are held to share the experience with facility operators, regulators, and people who have the responsibility of radiation protection. These details need to be communicated to the concerned people in a simple way. Communication is the key.

There is a gap in the knowledge. The idea of writing this guide is to put everything important in one place and let the people refer to the book for the latest information and updates in the field of their interest.

Order for the book from online Link: http://notionpress.com/read/radiological-protection-and-safety 

Discount coupon code: GOODDEAL45

The usefulness of LNT approach

There is controversy over the use of (Linear No-Threshold (LNT) hypothesis to estimate the stochastic risk of exposure to ionizing radiation. The approach is not universally accepted. However, the usefulness of the LNT approach for radiological protection is very significant. The concepts used in radiation protection are strongly based on the LNT hypothesis. For example, LNT allows radiation doses: (i) to be averaged within an organ or tissue, (ii) to be added from different organs, and (iii) to be added over time.

The LNT also underpins the concepts of absorbed dose, effective dose, committed dose, and the use of dose coefficients used to estimate internal dose from the intake of radionuclides.  

Calibration of dosemeters and doserate meters

International Standard ISO 29661:2012 defines terms and fundamental concepts for the calibration of dosemeters and equipment used for the radiation protection dosimetry of external radiation, in particular for beta, neutron and photon radiation. It defines the measurement quantities for radiation protection dosemeters and doserate meters and gives recommendations for establishing these quantities. For individual monitoring, it covers whole body and extremity dosemeters (including those for the skin and the eye lens), and for area monitoring, portable and installed dosemeters.

Guidelines are given for the calibration of dosemeters and doserate meters used for individual and area monitoring, in reference radiation fields. Recommendations are made for the position of the reference point and the phantom to be used for personal dosemeters. ISO 29661:2012 also deals with the determination of the response as a function of radiation quality and angle of radiation incidence. ISO 29661:2012 is intended to be used by calibration laboratories and manufacturers.

Is this information useful to you?

Basis for protection standard for uranium

Basis for protection standard for uranium

Uranium, a terrestrial radionuclide, is naturally present in the environment – in soil, rocks, in sea water, ground water, in food in the human body itself. The mass concentration of uranium varies from place to place depending on the environmental conditions. Natural uranium consists of three isotopes of uranium-²³⁸U, ²³⁵U and ²³⁴U with different half-lives. The longest-lived ²³⁸U has a half-life of 4.5 billion years. Typically, the soil concentration is about 3 parts per million (ppm).

In addition to its radioactive nature, it is, as water soluble uranium compounds, is chemically toxic. Uranium gets deposited in the kidneys due to its physicochemical properties. The US EPA (2001) and WHO (2011) standard for uranium in drinking water is 30 micrograms per liter which is equivalent to 0.75 Bq/liter. The threshold limit value (TLV) (ACGIH, 1994) in air in work environment for insoluble uranium is 0.2 mg/m³.

The protection standards for uranium (soluble) is limited by the chemical toxicity, while for insoluble compounds, the protection standards are based on radiological considerations. 

Exposure to EMF radiation

During use mobile phones and cord-less phones emit RF radiation. Other sources of the radiation are mobile phone base stations, Wi-Fi access points, lap tops and tablets. The exposures to RF radiation can be long-term or round-the -clock.  Cancer risks of radio-frequency radiation [RF] emitted by some devices in the frequency range of 30 kHz -300 GHz was also evaluated by the IARC for any possible risk for head and brain tumours. It was found that it is Group 2B – a possible human carcinogen. The data based on animal studies and epidemiological studies.

It is important that ambient levels of RF radiation in different locations should be measured to address the public health concern of RF radiation.  International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection [ICNIRP] standards are implemented by the industry to ensure public safety. However, as of now, the standards are based on thermal effects of RF radiation and non-thermal biological effects [stochastic] to the brain as a target organ are not considered. 

The guidelines provided by ICNIRP, the threshold level for behaviour changes in animals quoted is not a clear line between safety and hazard. It only indicates that EMF exposure below the threshold is safe. However, it is not correct to assume that above the given level the exposure is harmful. A safety factor of 10 is applied to the threshold level to obtain the occupational exposure limit. A safety factor of 50 is applied to obtain the guideline limit for the general public.

The Radio-frequency fields (measured in the units of microwatts/cm²) are generated by most of the mobile towers and modern wireless gadgets. The mobile towers catering to the upcoming 5G system for seamless connectivity will emit enhanced levels of RF fields, which will be of major public health concern. 

References

Hardell, L., WHO, Radiofrequency radiation and health – a hard nut to crack [review], Int. J. of Oncology, 51, 2017, 405-413

ICNIRP EMF Guidelines for limiting exposures to time-varying electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields-up to 300GHz, Health Physics, 74 [4], 1998, 494-522 [Being revised]

ICNIRP EMF Guidelines for limiting exposures to time-varying electric and magnetic fields, 1Hz-100kHz, Health Physics, 99[6], 2010, 818-836

Radiological safety in application of radiation in medicine

Positron Emission Tomography (PET)  is used as an imaging technique in a wide range of biomedical research applications in human patients and volunteers. Millions of PET scans are performed worldwide. Radio-tracer is introduced to the patient and its movement or deposition in the body is followed through a PET scan. A typical nuclear medicine procedure results in a radiation dose of around 25 mSv to a patient, while a CT scan using X-rays gives a dose of 5-8 mSv per scan, depending on which part of the body is scanned. To put risks in a proper perspective, natural background radiation dose is in the range of 2 to 3 mSv in year.

Radiation protection principle recommends optimization of the procedure to minimise patient dose. Some of possible ways of minimization of the dose is:

Ø Use highly sensitive and faster scanners for the procedure so that time spent is minimum for scanning so that the system can detect and perform scans at very low levels of emissions

Ø Optimise the radio-tracer dose to the patient to get a good scan

Ø Select a most suitable short-lived low energy photon emitting radiotracer

Ø Minimise radiation exposures of the healthy tissues/organs which are adjacent to the tissue/organ being scanned or treated. 

  

The procedures results in radiation dose (occupational exposures) to the medical, para-medical staff and technicians who are handling the radioactive material and who operate the machines for scanning. Scattered radiation from the primary beam is of concern, particularly to the eye lens, and needs to be monitored. Suitable radiation dosimetry technique should be used for the purpose. The hospital health physicist should ensure that the occupational exposures should be controlled and kept as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA).

Finally, the hospitals, the physicians/radiologist should avoid misuse of this technology for financial gains alone. In addition to the benefits to the patient from the procedure, the patients should be thoroughly briefed about the possible health effects from the exposure to radiation. Benefits should outweigh the risks of the exposures.